Comments: A response

You know, I can't put things any better than Kit, however, let me just do a quick comment for the record:
We all noticed that this guy doesn't really have a problem with Kit's (allright, maybe a small problem) views. He has a problem with Kit himself. Why? We may never know, but Banned IP is trying to prove Kit wrong, not his views. You can constantly see him refering to Kit (and his friends), trying to put them down, and using several arguments that should be disconsidered when discussing the issue itself.

You know, I don't believe that we need more discussions and rivarly like this in the world. If both Kit and Banned IP were both leaders, I bet a war would have been started already. Why would someone bother to insult someone? Probably because Banned IP doesn't like Kit, and insulting him "publicly" makes him feel better, making him win an unexistent battle. Just the kind of thing most (if not all) hate to see. You know, if you are trying to prove someone wrong, do it right. Don't get personal.

Next time, don't annoy us (or at least me) with several unfounded commentaries and arguments. Prove Kit wrong with real facts, not just opinions, and you may just get some respect back. Right now, you lost it all.

Posted by Cavalkaf at October 23, 2005 08:10 PM

umm.. this has nothing to do with your blog.. but I don't know how to contact you... so might as well trying to "email" you thru this...

So umm.. I'm kinda worried about you... I didn't see you in our class CS214 on October 20.. which by the way, is the due date for project no. 1... Did you passed your project no. 1? Well, we also have a midterm due on October 27... the description of what to do on midterm is on our teacher's site or better yet i will just give the link to our midterm which is www.utii.com/cs214/midterm.rtf

Well, i hope to see you in class this thursday... We were discussing about databases JDBC ODBC... I'm guessing this won't be boring for you anymore... :D.. take care...

Posted by Hans Sy at October 24, 2005 01:43 AM

Hey this is Ben, and this also doesn't have anything to do with your blog, and I know I'm being rude and prying into information that doesn't concern me, but I'm kinda interested to know who you(speaking to the previous commenter, Hans Sy) is. Obviously someone from your(Kit's) college course judging by the midterm assignment, but as so much of your college course is shrouded in mystery, it would be kind of interesting to get an idea of who you (Hans again) are and how you know Kit. Sorry for being blunt and rude.

Posted by Ben at October 24, 2005 05:23 PM

"Wow, you read BookWorld, why don't we hail you as the master of all knowledge. God forbid someone have a different opinion than you. I may not agree, science fiction on the whole is pretty stupid, if you ask me, but he is entitled to his own opinions."

So what you're saying is that he's entitled to my own opinions, but I'm not entitled to mine? I'm not saying all should worship me (because they shouldn't), but I would be much more afraid if people paid more respect to a retard like yourself.

Posted by Eric at October 24, 2005 08:00 PM

I will reply to this only after several apologies are made.

First: To Kit, if it seemed like I let it get too personal, sorry. I may not like you, but I think I kept that in check after the beginning. If you saw otherwise, my most sincere apologies.

Second: From Felipe to me. He has no right to complain about my "lack of argument." He has said nothing constructive. He simply piled on the wirter of this letter, then in response to me he complained about my opinion: "You know, I don't believe that we need more discussions and rivarly like this in the world. If both Kit and Banned IP were both leaders"

You complain about my opinion, by giving an opinion? Yeah. Think before you post please. I try to at least. You have done NOTHING. You just sit there going yes to whatever Kit says.

"I bet a war would have been started already. Why would someone bother to insult someone? "

I bet you would be wrong. You have no idea who I am, yet you randomly state that I would start a war over this. To be honest, this is bullshit. Start making logical arguments, don't rely on Kit to do the work for you, dipshit. You do pose a good question though. Why would you bother to insult the kid who wrote the letter? Why did Kit spend so much time writing those comments? Please answer.

"Next time, don't annoy us (or at least me) with several unfounded commentaries and arguments."

?
What exactly was Kit doing in the first place? Why is it that all of a sudden what annoys you is wrong, and what you think is funny is right? Kit's whole thing was a "commentary," it didn't bother you. And Kit was COMPLETLY UNFOUNDED.

"we all noticed that this guy doesn't really have a problem with Kit's (allright, maybe a small problem) views."

Because you speak for everyone. You have done nothing to express your views. All you do is reaffirm Kit's. You don't even have the right to enter this discussion. Besides, I can live without your respect.

Third: From me to "Eric." I was blunt and unclear. You misinterpreted what I was trying to say. Sometimes this happens when you rewrite something. You expect it already to have been said.

Fourth: From Eric to me. I have posted, to the best of my ability, a clear argument. I made mistakes, but that does not qualify me as a "retard." Your statement reeks of ego. "He insulted me, what a fag-ass retard." I am entitled to my opinion if I make it clear, which I may have not done in your case, but you have made no attempt whatsoever. I barely understood your post. You simply simplified what I said beyond recognition and "proved it wrong"

Fifth: From me to my readers. I have bad spelling and grammar sometimes, so please forgive any mistakes.

Sixth: From Kit to me.
"Next you go off on a rant about how smart you are. You really seem to enjoy the fact that you think you know something that no one else understands"

If that is how you took it, you are wrong. People like that don't try to explain themselves. Similar to your first post, I might add.

Not only that, but you call me egotisitc, insulting, considering how egotisitcal you come off as in the very end of what you say. And did I really say that about tearing apart your views? I believe I was talking to Evan, maybe Felipe at the time. Their "views" were poorly masked insults.

"Then start supporting Jack Thompson." Reliable source. Thanks Kit.

"Says the man posting on a blog, that noone but his closest friends read. How about this, next time, before you post, email me, or ask me, if I give a shit. See how much gets done, and how many people will be happy.""

? That wasn't meant for you. How the fuck could you take it like that. He posted on your "blog" didn't he? Perhaps you have a different definition of post. I was not referring to you. At all. I don't think they represent your views. You took some time to try and justify yourself, they simply hop on afterwards with "he said it"s

""Depressed teens are often irritable, taking out most of their anger on their family. They may attack others by being critical, sarcastic, or abusive.""

Wow, useful. A blanket definition of depressed that has nothing to do with him. What kind of depression? Manic? Was it combined with Generalized Anixiety disorder as mine is? The only reason I had that stuff with the book is because I didnt want my name out. As Evan, so sensitive, placed his name out for ridicule, I did not want the same thing to happen to me. I do not want to get patronized, unlike you. Anyway, I feel this way every fucking day. I have a pretty good insight therefore as to what it feels like. You on the other hand "lash out." I don't give a shit.

"Only I'm allowed to criticize people. When other people criticize they aren't being open minded enough."

Where did I say this? Where? What the fuck? Shut up you stupid bitch. You put words into my mouth like this? Fuck off retard. Rather than actually point out what was wrong with my argument, you make me up a new one.

"If he is the insecure version of depressed then why the fuck would he put his opinions on public display?"

Apparently he didn't. It was an accident to send it out remember? That last note was just to save face. Recover a little dignity. It also explains the spelling errors, something you failed to acknowledge. It also apologized, something you have yet to do.

"it is not an "easy out." You have to take creative writing in addition to a "regular" English course, so most colleges see it as taking initiative, especially if you drop some random art class (or whatever) in order to take it."

If you know it he knows it? You talk about perception, but can't seem to move past yours. What if his parents pressure him? What if they have drlled his future into him.

"Don't be a dick dude, you don't know anything. If you're taking a psychology course than keep in mind that you're still learning, and that honestly it takes most people a four-year college course combined with high-school courses to be able to diagnose most patients. Yes, Banned IP, Grand master of High School psychology."

Clearly the book was a bad way to handle things. I am not even in psychology. I don't give a shit. All I know is that insulting people for almost no reason is bad for self esteem. You have been made fun of your whole life. I would hope that you would realize the same thing. This guy made a mistake, you insult him for it. Does that make you feel big? Are you better for it?

"I mean, you haven't even met the guy, what the fuck do you know?"

I was in one of his classes last year. I talked to him. I know who he is. I also know how he thinks.

How about this. I will shut up if you take a video of you reading what you posted to his face. call him a self centered dipshit or whatever you want. I don't care. Tell him what you think of him to his face. If you hate him, tell him that. Don't make fun of him behind his back.

Posted by at October 26, 2005 08:29 PM

Also, I would like to express my frustration at your double standard Kit. You ignore whatever anyone who supports you says, no matter how wrong by your standards they are. You only attack those against you, and you do it through insults rather than arguments sometimes. Please, if you hate people who can't spell, tak to Alex and Ben. If you hate idiots talk about Felipe and me if you want. Dont ignore them.

Posted by at October 26, 2005 08:32 PM

"Wow, you read BookWorld, why don't we hail you as the master of all knowledge. God forbid someone have a different opinion than you. I may not agree, science fiction on the whole is pretty stupid, if you ask me, but he is entitled to his own opinions. And I must say, you don't seem to have the balls to place your views out for public showcase like this. And for good reason, some nerdy moron might have got ahold of them and "tore apart your poorly written views." I wonder why noone speaks out anymore. There is always some idiot who can only understand his point of view."

If I simplified or misinterpreted your views here, I apologize. But when an insult is personally directed at me, I expect an explanation. And when none exists, I ask for one. So now let me ask: what is it you were getting at? If you think you didn't express yourself clearly there, then TRY. No one has to give up and call it quits after they have said one thing.

Posted by at November 3, 2005 10:43 AM

What class did you post that in?

An explanation:

He wrote a letter, and in it he said that he wished to read "better" books. These books included Ender's Game. I am of the same opinion as you, calling that book "good" is a stretch. Despite this, I saw your immediate response as an attack, not a message. You attacked what he said was a good book, rather than stating your opinion of what makes a good book. You provided no standards by which to compare the two viewpoints, and in general made your post seem like a pure attack on him. Make no mistake, I sometimes do the same thing, and it was wrong for me to come across so harsh, but it seemed unfair to judge his post by his opinions in that situation. You had provided little more than a sentence saying he was wrong, you didn't really give an opinion. Like almost everyone, you attacked him, and his views, completly out of proportion with his "crime." I got a bit defensive, I don't know why, but that does not make you right.

Posted by at November 3, 2005 08:00 PM

OK, thank you. That's all I wanted to know. And I don't insist that I'm right. It's my opinion, just like yours and everyone else's. Don't assume that I'm trying to force my views down the throats of others. I'm just stating what I think, and there should be nothing wrong with that.

Posted by Eric at November 4, 2005 12:22 PM

"OK, thank you. That's all I wanted to know. And I don't insist that I'm right. It's my opinion, just like yours and everyone else's. Don't assume that I'm trying to force my views down the throats of others. I'm just stating what I think, and there should be nothing wrong with that."

In which case I misinterpreted your tone, and I apologize again.

Posted by at November 4, 2005 02:45 PM

Did I say something wrong?

Posted by at November 17, 2005 08:34 PM

No, I just haven't had time to reply. It's hard to word some of the things I'd like to say about this anyway. Expect an answer sometime mid-next week.

Posted by Kit at November 17, 2005 11:33 PM

Not quite what I meant. I understand that you are busy and all. I was just wondering why it became so difficult to get to your site all of a sudden.

Thanks anyway, though.

Posted by at November 20, 2005 11:09 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?